9.8. Append versus Concatenate¶
append method adds a new item to the end of a list. It is also possible to add a new item to the end of a list
by using the concatenation operator. However, you need to be careful.
Consider the following example. The original list has 3 integers. We want to add the word “cat” to the end of the list.
Here we have used
append which simply modifies the list. In order to use concatenation, we need to
write an assignment statement that uses the accumulator pattern:
origlist = origlist + ["cat"]
Note that the word “cat” needs to be placed in a list since the concatenation operator needs two lists to do its work.
It is also important to realize that with append, the original list is simply modified. On the other hand,
with concatenation, an entirely new list is created. This can be seen in the following codelens example
where``newlist`` refers to a list which is a copy of the original list,
origlist, with the new item
“cat” added to the end.
origlist still contains the three values it did before the concatenation.
This is why the assignment operation is necessary as part of the accumulator pattern.
This might be difficult to understand since these two lists appear to be the same. In Python, every object
has a unique identification tag. Likewise, there is a built-in function that can be called on any object to return
its unique id. The function is appropriately called
id and takes a single parameter, the object that you are
interested in knowing about. You can see in the example below that a real id is usually a very large integer value
(corresponding to an address in memory). In the textbook though the number will likely be smaller.
>>> alist = [4, 5, 6] >>> id(alist) 4300840544 >>>
Note how even though
origlist appear the same, they have different identifiers.
We have previously described x += 1 as a shorthand for x = x + 1. With lists, += is actually a little different. In particular, origlist += [“cat”] appends “cat” to the end of the original list object. If there is another alias for `origlist, this can make a difference, as in the code below. See if you can follow (or, better yet, predict, changes in the reference diagram).
We can use append or concatenate repeatedly to create new objects. If we had a string and wanted to make a new list, where each element in the list is a character in the string, where do you think you should start? In both cases, you’ll need to first create a variable to store the new object.
Then, character by character, you can add to the empty list. The process looks different if you concatentate as compared to using append.
This might become tedious though, and difficult if the length of the string is long. Can you think of a better way to do this?
Check your understanding