Before starting proof techniques, we introduce a few mathematical definitons. Keep in mind, mathematical definitions are constructed to provide a common language for proofs. They are intended to provide rigor and precision. They are not intended to provide conceptual understanding. You need to develop conceptual understanding of the terms apart from the definition. However, we need to rely on definitions to provide structure for our proofs.
You are probably familiar, generally, with even numbers such as 2, 4, 6, 8, and odd numbers such as 3, 5, 7, 9. But the next example uses the definitions to look at more examples.
Weβve now seen several examples of even/ odd integers. Are there integers which are both even and odd? Can an integer be neither even nor odd? The answer to both questions is no. However, proving that every integer is even or odd (and not both), is pretty challenging, and we wonβt try to do it, yet. We will use this fact, though, so if we know an integer is not even, then it must be odd, and vice versa.
Consider the statement βfor all positive integers \(r\) and \(s\text{,}\) if \(n=rs\) then \(r=1\) or \(s=1\)β from the definition for a prime number.
There are other ways to prove existence. One common way is a proof by contradiction, which we will see later in SectionΒ 4.5. There are several examples of existence proofs in calculus where it can be shown that something exists without constructing a specific value. For example, take a look at a proof of Rolleβs Theorem, the Mean Value Theorem, the Extreme Value Theorem, or the Taylor Remainder Theorem (Calc II).
A counterexample is really just an existence proof of the negation. But since we are showing the original statement is false, we usually just call it a counterexample to the (original) statement.
One of the most common mathematical statements is the universal conditional. We will see several techniques for proving \(\forall x\in D, P(x)\rightarrow Q(x)\text{.}\) The first method, method of exhaustion, is very limited, but worth mentioning.
We can find all the integers that are even and \(4\leq n\leq 16\text{.}\) This is the set \(\{4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16\}\text{.}\) For each of these numbers we can demonstrate a way to write them as the sum of primes: \(4=2+2, 6=3+3, 8=3+5, 10=3+7, 12=5+7, 14=7+7, 16=11+5\text{.}\)
The method of exhaustion only works if we can show the statement for every \(x\in D\text{.}\) But if \(D\) is infinite, we need to use a more general method.
Let \(x\) be even. Then by definition, \(x=2k\) for some \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\text{.}\) Then \(x+1=2k+1\) where \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\text{.}\) Which means \(x+1\) is odd.
Note, this statement is not obviously in the form of an if...then. We often have to translate statements into a more formal statement before proving them. Translation:
Let \(a, b\) be even. Then by definition, \(a=2k\) for some \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\) and \(b=2j\) for some \(j\in \mathbb{Z}\text{.}\) (Note, we cannot use \(k\) for both \(a\) and \(b\) as they likely are two different numbers.) Then \(a+b=2k+2j=2(k+j)\) where \(k+j\in \mathbb{Z}\text{.}\) Which means \(a+b\) is even.
The audience for your proofs is not the instructor. Think of the audience as being your peers in the course or even yourself in a few weeks (or months) when you might have forgotten the specific content. Write so you will know what you meant later.
The goal of a proof is to write a clear, easy to follow, argument--not to just get to the end. The βanswerβ is the proof itself. Use space, start a new line, set equations on their own line.
Never feel that you have to be able to know what the end of the proof will look like before you can start. Write proofs one step at a time. Start with what you know. See if you can do one thing. See if you can do another thing. Look at where you want to go. Do not try to see the whole picture at once. This is also good advice for reading a proof.
Jumping to conclusions. Giving inadequate reasons. This often occur if you rely on additional mathematical ideas or donβt connect your ideas to each other.
Assuming what you need to prove. This is a big one. This most often occurs when there is confusion about conditional statements. Be careful about identifying the βifβ and the βthenβ in a statement.
Often in math we need to identify whether a statement is true or false, so that we know whether we need to prove the true statement or disprove the false one.
After trying several examples, we might guess that it is false. If we want to disprove the statement then we need to prove the negation. Find the negation of the statement.
Let \(r=n+2, s=n+1\text{.}\) We need to show that \(r, s\neq 1\text{.}\) Since \(n>0, n+2>2\) and \(n+1>1\text{.}\) Thus \(r, s\neq 1\text{.}\) Therefore, \(n^2+3n+2\) is not prime.
βProofβ: Suppose \(n\) is an odd integer, and \(m\) is an even integer. By definition of odd, \(n=2k+1\) where \(k\) is an integer, and by definition of even \(m=2k\) where \(k\) is an integer. Then
\begin{equation*}
n-m=2k+1-2k=1.
\end{equation*}
Since 1 is odd the difference between an odd integer and and even integer is odd.