The Binomial Theorem has applications in many areas of mathematics, from calculus, to number theory, to probability. In this section we look at some examples of combinatorial proofs using binomial coefficients and ultimately prove the Binomial Theorem using induction.
An algebraic proof is straightforward and left as an exercise (see ExerciseΒ 9.6.1). We will give a combinatorial proof. This means we will prove the two sides of the equation are equal by showing that they are two different ways to count the same set. In general, a combinatorial proof is done by giving a counting argument.
We can create a set of \(r\) objects by specifying which objects are in the set or by specifying which objects are not in the set. We note that there are \(n-r\) objects not in the set. Thus, \(\binom{n}{n-r}\) counts the ways to find a set of \(r\) objects out of \(n\) objects by finding the ways to not include \(n-r\) objects. Thus, both \(\binom{n}{r}\) and \(\binom{n}{n-r}\) count subsets of \(r\) objects from \(n\text{,}\) one by counting the objects in the set, one by counting the objects not in the set.
Let \(S=\{x_1, x_2, \ldots x_{n+1}\}\text{,}\) a set of \(n+1\) objects. We can create all the subsets of \(r\) objects by choosing all \(r\) objects from \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_n\}\) or by choosing \(r-1\) out of \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_n\}\) and including \(x_{n+1}\text{.}\) Thus, we can count the subsets of \(r\) objects from \(n\) objects with \(\binom{n}{r}+\binom{n}{r-1}\text{.}\)
Start with the right-hand side. Use the definition of βchoose,β then find a common denominator. Note, you will save yourself a lot of work if you find the least common denominator.
We get each number in a row by adding the two numbers above. If there is only one number, you just get 1. For example, the fourth row is 1, 3, 3, 1, since \(1+2=3\text{.}\) The next row would be 1, 4, 6, 4, 1.
If you calculate the binomial coefficients, you will see that you get the same values as Pascalβs Triangle. Furthermore, Pascalβs Formula is just the rule we use to get the triangle: add the \(r-1\) and \(r\) terms from the \(n^{th}\) row to get the \(r\) term in the \(n+1\) row.
The Binomial Theorem gives a formula for calculating \((a+b)^n\text{.}\) We can prove the Binomial Theorem combinatorially or algebraically. We will provide the algebraic proof, which is a proof by induction. Although we do not provide the details of the combinatorial proof, the next example should give some insight into the combinatorial argument.
Now we want to change the index of the second sum. This is just a substitution of variable that allows us to shift how we index the terms. If we were to write out the sum, rather than have it in summation notation, we would not need this step. But it allows us to easily combine like terms in the two summations. So, in the second sum, let \(j=i+1\text{,}\) so when \(i=0, j=1\text{;}\) when \(i=k, j=k+1\text{,}\) and \(i=j-1\text{.}\) We get
\begin{align*}
(a+b)^{k+1}&=\sum_{i=0}^{k}\binom{k}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i+\sum_{i=0}^{k}\binom{k}{i}a^{k-i}b^{i+1}\\
&=\sum_{i=0}^{k}\binom{k}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i+\sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\binom{k}{j-1}a^{k+1-j}b^j\\
&=a^{k+1}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\binom{k}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i+\sum_{j=1}^{k}\binom{k}{j-1}a^{k+1-j}b^j+b^{k+1}\\
&\text{where we pulled out the first term of the first sum}\\
&\text{and the last term of the second sum}\\
&=a^{k+1}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\binom{k}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\binom{k}{i-1}a^{k+1-i}b^i+b^{k+1}\\
&\text{where we just relabeled the index in the second sum}\\
&=a^{k+1}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\biggl[\binom{k}{i}+\binom{k}{i-1}\biggr]a^{k+1-i}b^i+b^{k+1}\\
&\text{where we combined like terms in the two sums}\\
&=a^{k+1}+\sum_{i=1}^{k}\binom{k+1}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i+b^{k+1}\\
&\text{by Pascal's Formula}\\
&=\sum_{i=0}^{k+1}\binom{k+1}{i}a^{k+1-i}b^i
\end{align*}
The Binomial Theorem relates a sum to a power of a binomial. Although we often think of using the Binomial Theorem as a way to calculate the coefficients for expanding \((a+b)^n\text{,}\) it can also be used to simplify certain sums. In this case, the power of the binomial is the closed form.
We can see that \(x=b\text{,}\) since the power of \(x\) matches the power of \(b\text{.}\) Since there does not appear to be any term for \(a\text{,}\) we can let \(a=1\text{.}\) Thus, the closed form is \((1+x)^n\text{.}\)
Think of a set with \(m+n\) elements as composed of two parts, one with \(m\) elements and one with \(n\) elements. Give a combinatorial argument to show that
Think of counting a single set in two different ways, where one side of the equation represents one way and the other side represents the other way. Since they both count the same set, they should be equal.