# 4.6. Implementing an Ordered Linked List¶

In order to implement the ordered linked list, we must remember that the relative positions of the items are based on some underlying characteristic. The ordered linked list of integers given above (17, 26, 31, 54, 77, and 93) can be represented by a linked structure as shown in Figure 15. Again, the node and link structure is ideal for representing the relative positioning of the items.

To implement the `OrderedList`

class, we will use the same technique
as seen previously with unordered linked lists. Once again, an empty linked list will
be denoted by a `head`

reference to `NULL`

(see
Listing 8).

**Listing 8**

```
class OrderedList {
Node* head;
}
```

As we consider the operations for the ordered linked list, we should note that
the `isEmpty`

and `size`

methods can be implemented the same as
with unordered linked lists since they deal only with the number of nodes in
the linked list without regard to the actual item values. Likewise, the
`remove`

method will work just fine since we still need to find the
item and then link around the node to remove it. The two remaining
methods, `search`

and `add`

, will require some modification.

The search of an unordered linked list required that we traverse the
nodes one at a time until we either find the item we are looking for or
run out of nodes (`NULL`

). It turns out that the same approach would
actually work with the ordered linked list and in fact in the case where we
find the item it is exactly what we need. However, in the case where the
item is not in the linked list, we can take advantage of the ordering to stop
the search as soon as possible.

For example, Figure 16 shows the ordered linked list as a
search is looking for the value 45. As we traverse, starting at the head
of the linked list, we first compare against 17. Since 17 is not the item we
are looking for, we move to the next node, in this case 26. Again, this
is not what we want, so we move on to 31 and then on to 54. Now, at this
point, something is different. Since 54 is not the item we are looking
for, our former strategy would be to move forward. However, due to the
fact that this is an ordered linked list, that will not be necessary. Once the
value in the node becomes greater than the item we are searching for,
the search can stop and return `False`

. There is no way the item could
exist further out in the linked list.

Listing 9 shows the complete `search`

method. It is
easy to incorporate the new condition discussed above by adding another
boolean variable, `stop`

, and initializing it to `False`

(line 4).
While `stop`

is `False`

(not `stop`

) we can continue to look
forward in the linked list (line 5). If any node is ever discovered that
contains data greater than the item we are looking for, we will set
`stop`

to `True`

(lines 9–10). The remaining lines are identical to
the unordered linked list search.

**Listing 9**

```
bool search(int item) {
Node *current = head;
bool found = false;
bool stop = false;
while (current != NULL && !found && !stop) {
if (current->getData() == item) {
found = true;
} else {
if (current->getData() > item) {
stop = true;
} else {
current = current->getNext();
}
}
}
return found;
}
```

The most significant method modification will take place in `add`

.
Recall that for unordered linked lists, the `add`

method could simply place a
new node at the head of the linked list. It was the easiest point of access.
Unfortunately, this will no longer work with ordered linked lists. It is now
necessary that we discover the specific place where a new item belongs
in the existing ordered linked list.

Assume we have the ordered linked list consisting of 17, 26, 54, 77, and 93 and
we want to add the value 31. The `add`

method must decide that the new
item belongs between 26 and 54. Figure 17 shows the setup
that we need. As we explained earlier, we need to traverse the linked
list looking for the place where the new node will be added. We know we
have found that place when either we run out of nodes (`current`

becomes `NULL`

) or the value of the current node becomes greater than
the item we wish to add. In our example, seeing the value 54 causes us
to stop.

As we saw with unordered linked lists, it is necessary to have an additional
reference, again called `previous`

, since `current`

will not provide
access to the node that must be modified. Listing 10 shows
the complete `add`

method. Lines 2–3 set up the two external
references and lines 9–10 again allow `previous`

to follow one node
behind `current`

every time through the iteration. The condition (line
5) allows the iteration to continue as long as there are more nodes and
the value in the current node is not larger than the item. In either
case, when the iteration fails, we have found the location for the new
node.

The remainder of the method completes the two-step process shown in
Figure 17. Once a new node has been created for the item,
the only remaining question is whether the new node will be added at the
beginning of the linked list or some place in the middle. Again,
`previous == NULL`

(line 13) can be used to provide the answer.

**Listing 10**

```
void add(int item) {
if (head == NULL) {
Node *newNode = new Node(item);
head = newNode;
} else {
Node *current = head;
Node *previous = NULL;
bool stop = false;
while (current != NULL && !stop) {
if (current->getData() > item) {
stop = true;
} else {
previous = current;
current = current->getNext();
}
}
Node *temp = new Node(item);
if (previous == NULL) {
temp->setNext(head);
head = temp;
} else {
temp->setNext(current);
previous->setNext(temp);
}
}
}
```

The `OrderedList`

class with methods discussed thus far can be found
in ActiveCode 1.
We leave the remaining methods as exercises. You should carefully
consider whether the unordered implementations will work given that the
linked list is now ordered.

## 4.6.1. Analysis of Linked Lists¶

To analyze the complexity of the linked list operations, we need to
consider whether they require traversal. Consider a linked list that has
*n* nodes. The `isEmpty`

method is \(O(1)\) since it requires
one step to check the head reference for `NULL`

. `size`

, on the
other hand, will always require *n* steps since there is no way to know
how many nodes are in the linked list without traversing from head to
end. Therefore, `length`

is \(O(n)\). Adding an item to an
unordered linked list will always be O(1) since we simply place the new node at
the head of the linked list. However, `search`

and `remove`

, as well
as `add`

for an ordered linked list, all require the traversal process.
Although on average they may need to traverse only half of the nodes,
these methods are all \(O(n)\) since in the worst case each will
process every node in the linked list.

You may also have noticed that the performance of this linked list implementation differs from the performance given earlier for Python lists. This suggests that linked lists are not the way Python lists are implemented. The actual implementation of a Python list is based on the notion of an array. We discuss this in more detail in Chapter 8.